These Two New Missions Will Take Us Closer to the Sun Than Ever Before

Your daily selection of the latest science news!

According to Space.com

Cover image

ESA’s Solar Orbiter will take the first-ever direct images of the sun’s poles.

Credit: Spacecraft: ESA/ATG medialab; Sun: NASA/SDO/P. Testa (CfA)

Soon, two ambitious missions will take us closer to the sun than we’ve ever gone before, providing invaluable insight into how our star really works.

 
Launching in the summer of 2018 and in 2020, respectively, NASA’s Parker Solar Probe and the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Solar Orbiter will work to gather up-close data of the sun. And, while these missions will use different technologies, “as missions — they’ll be complementary,” Eric Christian, a research scientist on the Parker Solar Probe mission, said in a statement from NASA.

 
The sun is a life-sustaining source of energy for life here on Earth. However, solar wind, a stream of charged gas streaming from its surface, can threaten the technologies that drive radio communications, satellites and power grids. Because the sun, and the solar wind, so directly and drastically affect us, it is imperative that we understand it better to protect ourselves against potential negative events. [NASA’s Parker Solar Probe Mission to Touch the Sun Explained (Infographic)]

 
Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter will both observe the sun’s corona — its unpredictable, gaseous outer atmosphere. If you were able to see the white, hair-like pieces surrounding the sun during the 2017 total solar eclipse, then you saw the solar corona. According to the NASA statement, many scientists believe that the corona could drive the speed of solar wind. However, the corona is not very well understood.

 
“Our goal is to understand how the sun works and how it affects the space environment to the point of predictability. This is really a curiosity-driven science,” Chris St. Cyr, a Solar Orbiter project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, said in the statement.

 
Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter — which are separate, but complementary, missions — aim to help researchers better understand the sun’s unpredictable behavior. They will “be taking pictures of the sun’s corona at the same time, and they’ll be seeing some of the same structures — what’s happening at the poles of the sun and what those same structures look like at the equator,” Christian said.

 
Solar Orbiter, which will orbit the sun on a tilt from 26 million miles away, will take the first-ever direct images of the sun’s poles. This will allow scientists to better understand the sun’s magnetic fields, since some of our star’s magnetic activity is concentrated at its poles.

NASA's Parker Solar Probe will get closer to the sun than we've ever gone before.

NASA’s Parker Solar Probe will get closer to the sun than we’ve ever gone before.

Credit: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory

 
Parker Solar Probe will get significantly closer to the sun, inching as close as 3.8 million miles from its surface. From this close distance, the probe will be able to image solar wind, study magnetic fields and observe both plasma and energetic particles, NASA officials said in the statement. This probe will also carry with it a memory card holding 1,137,202 names, including William Shatner’s — cheering it on as it travels to the sun.

 
We don’t yet understand how the sun’s magnetic field is created or structured, why its corona behaves in a way that seems impossible to predict, or what’s influencing the dangerous solar wind. These two missions from NASA and ESA aim to change that.

 
Email Chelsea Gohd at cgohd@space.com or follow her @chelsea_gohd. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.

 

Continue reading…

  • Got any news, tips or want to contact us directly? Feel free to email us: esistme@gmail.com. To see more posts like this please subscribe to our newsletter by entering your email. By subscribing you’ll receive the top trending news delivered to your inbox.
    __

This article and images were originally posted on [Space.com] May 30, 2018 at 07:10AM. Credit to Author and Space.com | ESIST.T>G>S Recommended Articles Of The Day

 

 

 

Juno Isn’t Exactly Where it’s Supposed To Be. The Flyby Anomaly is Back, But Why Does it Happen?

Your daily selection of the latest science news!

According to Universe Today

In the early 1960s, scientists developed the gravity-assist method, where a spacecraft would conduct a flyby of a major body in order to increase its speed. Many notable missions have used this technique, including the Pioneer, Voyager, Galileo, Cassini, and New Horizons missions. In the course of many of these flybys, scientists have noted an anomaly where the increase in the spacecraft’s speed did not accord with orbital models.

This has come to be known as the “flyby anomaly”, which has endured despite decades of study and resisted all previous attempts at explanation. To address this, a team of researchers from the University Institute of Multidisciplinary Mathematics at the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia have developed a new orbital model based on the maneuvers conducted by the Juno probe.

The study, which recently appeared online under the title “A Possible Flyby Anomaly for Juno at Jupiter“, was conducted by Luis Acedo, Pedro Piqueras and Jose A. Morano. Together, they examined the possible causes of the so-called “flyby anomaly” using the perijove orbit of the Juno probe. Based on Juno’s many pole-to-pole orbits, they not only determined that it too experienced an anomaly, but offered a possible explanation for this.

To break it down, the speed of a spacecraft is determined by measuring the Doppler shift of radio signals from the spacecraft to the antennas on the Deep Space Network (DSN). During the 1970s when the Pioneer 10 and 11 probes were launched, visiting Jupiter and Saturn before heading off towards the edge of the Solar System, these probes both experienced something strange as they passed between 20 to 70 AU (Uranus to the Kuiper Belt) from the Sun.

Basically, the probes were both 386,000 km (240,000 mi) farther from where existing models predicted they would be. This came to be known as the “Pioneer anomaly“, which became common lore within the space physics community. While the Pioneer anomaly was resolved, the same phenomena has occurred many times since then with subsequent missions. As Dr. Acebo told Universe Today via email:

“The “flyby anomaly” is a problem in astrodynamics discovered by a JPL’s team of researchers lead by John Anderson in the early 90s. When they tried to fit the whole trajectory of the Galileo spacecraft as it approached the Earth on December, 8th, 1990, they found that this only can be done by considering that the ingoing and outgoing pieces of the trajectory correspond to asymptotic velocities that differ in 3.92 mm/s from what is expected in theory.

“The effect appears both in the Doppler data and in the ranging data, so it is not a consequence of the measurement technique. Later on, it has also been found in several flybys performed by Galileo again in 1992, the NEAR [Near Earth Asteroid Rendezvous mission] in 1998, Cassini in 1999 or Rosetta and Messenger in 2005. The largest discrepancy was found for the NEAR (around 13 mm/s) and this is attributed to the very close distance of 532 Km to the surface of the Earth at the perigee.”

Another mystery is that while in some cases the anomaly was clear, in others it was on the threshold of detectability or simply absent – as was the case with Juno‘s flyby of Earth in October of 2013. The absence of any convincing explanation has led to a number of explanations, ranging from the influence or dark matter and tidal effects to extensions of General Relativity and the existence of new physics.

However, none of these have produced a substantive explanation that could account for flyby anomalies. To address this, Acedo and his colleagues sought to create a model that was optimized for the Juno mission while at perijove – i.e. the point in the probe’s orbit where it is closest to Jupiter’s center. As Acedo explained:

After the arrival of Juno at Jupiter on July, 4th, 2016, we had the idea of developing our independent orbital model to compare with the fitted trajectories that were being calculated by the JPL team at NASA. After all, Juno is performing very close flybys of Jupiter because the altitude over the top clouds (around 4000 km) is a small fraction of the planet’s radius. So, we expected to find the anomaly here.  This would be an interesting addition to our knowledge of this effect because it would prove that it is not only a particular problem with Earth flybys but that it is universal.”

Their model took into account the tidal forces exerted by the Sun and by Jupiter’s larger satellites – Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto – and also the contributions of the known zonal harmonics. They also accounted for Jupiter’s multipolar fields, which are the result of the planet oblate shape, since these play a far more important role than tidal forces as Juno reaches perijove.

In the end, they determined that an anomaly could also be present during the Juno flybys of Jupiter. They also noted a significant radial component in this anomaly, one which decayed the farther the probe got from the center of Jupiter. As Acebo explained:

“Our conclusion is that an anomalous acceleration is also acting upon the Juno spacecraft in the vicinity of the perijove (in this case, the asymptotic velocity is not a useful concept because the trajectory is closed). This acceleration is almost one hundred times larger than the typical anomalous accelerations responsible for the anomaly in the case of the Earth flybys. This was already expected in connection with Anderson et al.’s initial intuition that the effect increases with the angular rotational velocity of the planet (a period of 9.8 hours for Jupiter vs the 24 hours of the Earth), the radius of the planet and probably its mass.”

They also determined that this anomaly appears to be dependent on the ratio between the spacecraft’s radial velocity and the speed of light, and that this decreases very fast as the craft’s altitude over Jupiter’s clouds changes. These issues were not predicted by General Relativity, so there is a chance that flyby anomalies are the result of novel gravitational phenomena – or perhaps, a more conventional effect that has been overlooked.

In the end, the model that resulted from their calculations accorded closely with telemetry data provided by the Juno mission, though questions remain. Further research is necessary because the pattern of the anomaly seems very complex and a single orbit (or a sequence of similar orbits as in the case of Juno) cannot map the whole field,” said Acebo. “A dedicated mission is required but financial cuts and limited interest in experimental gravity may prevent us to see this mission in the near future.”

It is a testament to the complexities of physics that even after sixty years of space exploration – and one hundred years since General Relativity was first proposed – that we are still refining our models. Perhaps someday we will find there are no mysteries left to solve, and the Universe will make perfect sense to us. What a terrible day that will be!

Read more…

  • Got any news, tips or want to contact us directly? Email esistme@gmail.com

__

This article and images were originally posted on [Universe Today] December 1, 2017 at 03:49PM. Credit to Author and Universe Today | ESIST.T>G>S Recommended Articles Of The Day

 

 

 

Orion deep in processing for EM-1, planning for following missions

no alt

As US Vice President Mike Pence visited the Kennedy Space Center (KSC), one of the welcoming party, the Orion crew module, is fast taking shape ahead of its Exploration Mission-1 (EM-1) flight. With major processing milestones – such as the mating of the heatshield with the Crew Module, NASA managers are already thinking ahead to future flights involving Orion.

Crew Module status:

The crew module is in the Operations and Checkout (O&C) Building at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) in Florida, where the system components are being integrated with the vehicle structure.

The EM-1 crew module is well on its way,” Lara Kearney said in an interview with NASASpaceflight.com. Kearney is manager of the Orion Crew and Service Module Office at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas.

“The pressure vessel was down at Kennedy well over a year ago and then last summer basically was an influx of all of the components that are then assembled to that pressure vessel like the propulsion components, life support components, a lot of our landing and recovery systems like our airbags [and] our parachutes.

“So all these components were delivered over the course of this past year and then the assembly team down at Kennedy is putting it all together.  The life support system is already installed, the prop system is already installed, they have been leak-checked and are ready to go. We just installed our main parachutes, so they’re stowed in the forward bay and they’re ready to go.”

With Lockheed Martin the prime contractor for Orion, the pressure vessel for the crew module is welded in an area of the expansive, multi-user Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, Louisiana.  The EM-1 pressure vessel is the third iteration of the structure.

“For Exploration Flight Test-1 (EFT-1), we had eighteen welded parts [that weighed] about 3300 pounds.  With Exploration Mission-1, we’re down to seven welded parts and 2700 pounds,” Kearney noted.

EFT-1 was the first test flight of the Orion crew module (CM) and mass simulators standing in for the service module elements in December, 2014.  The first pressure vessel article built was a Ground Test Article that was used for testing at different facilities.

“It was at 31 welded parts and 3900 pounds.  That was kind of the first attempt at the primary structure,” Kearney added.

After welding was completed, the pressure vessel was shipped to KSC in early February, 2016.

“We’re always dealing with mass and trying to control mass,” she noted.  “As something grows, something else has to come down, but we’re getting to the point now where we’re really trying not to continue to redesign the primary pressure vessel components, simply because that just takes money to do that.

“We’re going to have to go after other components that are not yet fully designed, like the items that are coming on EM-2, like the life support components and such.  Same with the heatshield, we’re trying to lock that heatshield in and not redesign it.”

Heatshield changes:

One of the major changes to the crew module between EFT-1 and EM-1 was to the base heatshield that attaches to the bottom of the crew module. The Orion crew module incorporates the same outer moldline as the Apollo command module, but is larger in size.  The heatshield design that flew on EFT-1 was also ‘scaled up’ from Apollo.

“On EFT-1, it was basically what we called a ‘monolithic’ heatshield,” Kearney explained.  “There was a small honeycomb structure that covered the composite skin with hundreds of thousands of little cells that were filled with this ablative material [Avcoat] that for all intents and purposes created a single, monolithic ablative shell that covered the bottom of the heatshield.

“We’re now using that same ablative material, but manufacturing it into these blocks and then adhering these blocks to that composite structure.

“So that’s the fundamental architecture change and ultimately we did that for a couple of reasons. One, that monolithic design was having some structural/mechanical challenges that we can overcome by going to these blocks and the block architecture is a lot less intensive from a manufacturing perspective.  So it’s fundamentally a lower life-cycle cost option for us.”

Kearney said work on heatshield assembly at KSC is progressing towards its Autumn date for integration with the Crew Module it will be tasked with protecting during re-entry.

“The titanium structure along with the composite skin, we’ve been bonding all the tile blocks to it.  All of the blocks are now on and in place and ready to go and they’re now moving into the process of what we call filling the gaps between all of those blocks and that heatshield will be installed onto the crew module in the fall time-frame.”

Although the blocks of the ablative material are fundamentally different from the insulating tiles on the Space Shuttle, they are attached to the structure and to each other in a similar fashion.

“They’re adhered by an adhesive to the underlying structure and then this gap filler is there between them to hold them all together,” she said, adding the gap filler for the Avcoat blocks was a ‘RTV-like’ material (RTV is short for Room Temperature Vulcanizer) that will cure in the gaps.

The EM-1 mission will be the first opportunity to test Orion’s re-entry to Earth’s atmosphere at lunar return speeds.  The spacecraft reached a velocity of approximately 20000 miles per hour during the EFT-1 entry, descent, and landing (EDL).  For re-entries from the Moon, Orion will reach speeds of approximately 25000 mph.

Service Module integration:

The EM-1 mission will exercise the new capabilities added to Orion since the short EFT-1 mission in low Earth orbit.

In contrast to EFT-1, Orion will fly with a fully functional European Service Module (ESM).

2016-11-07-191900The ESM gives Orion propulsion, power, and thermal control capabilities to allow it fly on its own into and out of lunar orbit.  The ESM will also carry air and water provisions on future crewed flights.

The Orion flight software is also evolving on EM-1 to integrate and control the added capabilities, including expanded guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) functionality and communications networking needed to fly beyond Earth orbit.

A separate element, the Crew Module Adapter (CMA), sits between the CM the ESM.

“It’s the Crew Module Adapter that actually physically mates the ESA (European Space Agency) Service Module to the Crew Module and it’s through that Crew Module Adapter that all the interfaces flow, so all the gasses, power, data, all that kind of stuff flows through that adapter,” Kearney explained.

“That’s basically where our interface control is held is in that Crew Module Adapter.  When the ESA Service Module comes to us, it’ll be mated within this service module structure that Lockheed is currently building down at the O&C in Florida.”

2015-06-20-144149Lockheed Martin builds those other Service Module components, the CMA, the Service Module fairing panels, and the spacecraft adapter.

On EM-1, launch on the Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle and Interim Cryogenic Propulsion System (ICPS) upper stage puts Orion on a week-long translunar trajectory; when the spacecraft reaches the Moon, it will fire its engines to maneuver into a Distant Retrograde Orbit.

After remaining in that orbit for approximately a week, the spacecraft will perform another set of maneuvering burns to leave lunar orbit and return to Earth about a week later.

The first ESM, Flight Model-1, is being integrated at an Airbus Defence and Space facility in Bremen, Germany.  Airbus is the prime contractor for the ESM.

2016-03-31-230912As with other EM-1 spacecraft and launch vehicle elements being designed, developed, and assembled for the first time, its readiness date has been delayed, with current estimates that it will ship to KSC late this year or early next.

Once the ESM arrives at KSC, it will be mated with the rest of the Service Module elements.  It will be mated to the CMA and have its Orbital Maneuvering Engine (OME) nozzle re-attached.  The spacecraft adapter that connects with the launch vehicle will also be attached.  The integrated Service Module will then be mated to the CM, forming the “Short Stack.”

The mated spacecraft and accompanying hardware (such as Service Module fairing panels and solar arrays) will then be transported from KSC to the Plum Brook Station test facility at NASA’s Glenn Research Center in Ohio for integrated environmental testing such as vacuum and acoustic tests.

The spacecraft and hardware will then all return to KSC for final launch preparations, where the crew and service modules will be fueled with maneuvering propellant and integrated with the launch abort system for final mating to the launch vehicle.

EM-2 and beyond:

The final major development phase for Orion is planned between EM-1 and EM-2, which is the first mission that will fly crew.

Most of the Environmental Control Life Support System (ECLSS) and crew systems will be developed to integrate with the rest of the spacecraft systems for the first time.

“Basically that’s everything that comes along with the crew – so that’ll be the flight seats, the [space]suits, the umbilicals that go along with that, all of the what we call flight crew equipment which is the stuff they carry on board with them,” Kearney explained.

“Things like air monitors and fire extinguishers and food, water dispensers, those kind of things.  The displays and controls will be new on EM-2 and then of course the life support system that is associated with the air circulating system, the carbon dioxide removal system, and the water system that’s cooling the crew will all be new on EM-2.”

The spacesuits for the early Orion missions are derived from the launch and entry suits worn by crews for most of the Space Shuttle program.

“The big difference is that Shuttle is what we called open loop — where the oxygen system flows to the suits and then the crew would breathe and then the suits would dump overboard into the Shuttle cabin,” Kearney explained.

2016-03-31-231428“On Orion, we’re [a] closed loop system, and so that’s the change from the Shuttle suits is that we’ve closed them up.  We have a circulating system between the life support [system] on the crew module that flows into the suits in a closed loop.”

Although there will be little ECLSS functionality on EM-1, some hardware will fly in the crew module to collect environmental data.

“We are flying a couple of seats and some mannequins inside, collecting some radiation data on them,” Kearney added.  “For the most part it’s [those] mass simulators [and] some cameras.  The suited quote ‘dummies’ [are] anthropometric crash test dummy kind of things.”

For the EM-2 mission, current plans are to fly a more conservative circumlunar profile, with an extended checkout period in high Earth orbit first.  If everything checks out satisfactorily, Orion would then make a single flyby of the Moon and return to Earth for splashdown.

The other major objective for the EM-2 mission is for the SLS to put the first element of a Deep Space Gateway (DSG), a Power and Propulsion Element (PPE), on a translunar trajectory.

In what is called a “Multi Translunar Injection” (MTLI) flight profile, the SLS will perform separate burns to partially deliver Orion to one translunar trajectory and completely send the PPE to another.

After reaching an initial parking orbit around Earth, the SLS would first raise the apogee of the orbit to a high-altitude with an orbital period of about 24 hours, which will allow an extended checkout of Orion while remaining close to Earth on its first flight with crew.

Shortly after that burn ends, Orion would separate to a safe distance from SLS with the PPE.  Then SLS would then restart to complete a Translunar Injection (TLI) burn with the PPE.  Meanwhile, Orion would stay in the highly elliptical Earth orbit until the next day when it would perform its own burn to complete its TLI, which would put the spacecraft and crew on a free-return trajectory.

After separating from SLS, the PPE will use its own propulsion systems once it reaches the Moon to insert itself into a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO), where subsequent Exploration Missions will rally with supplies and additional DSG elements.

The next Exploration Mission, EM-3, is tentatively planned to rendezvous and dock with the Power Propulsion Element in lunar orbit and Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking (RPOD) is one of the additional capabilities that will be added to Orion after EM-2.

“The plan right now is to work towards the docking capability for EM-3,” Kearney said.  “We’re at the very beginning of that process,…but our budgetary plans right now are laid out to support docking on EM-3.”

On EM-3 the SLS launcher would perform a TLI burn with both Orion and a habitation module for the DSG.  On their way to the Moon, the Orion would then separate from the SLS upper stage, turn around, and dock to the Hab module.

After the mated Orion and Hab module separated from the booster, they would continue into the lunar halo orbit, where they would rendezvous and dock with the PPE.

(Images: NASA, Cody Zoller and L2 artist Nathan Koga – The full gallery of Nathan’s (SpaceX Dragon to MCT, SLS, Commercial Crew and more) L2 images can be *found here*))

(To Join L2, Click Here: http://ift.tt/1pzqA43)

Share This Article

__

This article and images was originally posted on [NASASpaceFlight.com] July 6, 2017 at 04:56PM

by Philip Sloss

 

 

 

 

China just launched two astronauts into space 

1.jpg

China has launched two astronauts into space, where they’ll spend 30 days living and performing experiments on board the Tiangong 2 space lab.

The expedition will be the longest stay in space for Chinese astronauts to date, and will help them prepare for future crewed missions to the Moon and Mars, and achieve their goal of having a permanent space station in orbit by 2022.

The two astronauts, 49-year-old Jing Haipeng (who has already been to space twice) and 37-year-old Chen Dong, launched from the Jiuquan Satellite Launch Centre in the Gobi Desert at 23:30 GMT.

They’ll ride up and back in the Shenzhou-11 spacecraft, which was lifted by a Long March-2F rocket, and within two days will dock with Tiangong 2.

This was China’s sixth manned space launch, but to date the country’s astronauts have only spent 15 days into space, so this will double the length of a crewed mission.

While on board, the astronauts will carry out a range of experiments, such as growing plants in space and using ultrasound equipment to test the effects of space on their own bodies.

They’ll also be testing computers, as well as propulsion and life support systems on board Tiangong 2.

Tiangong is Chinese for “heavenly palace”, and it was launched last month to become the second of China’s space labs in orbit.

The first space lab, Tiangong 1, was launched in 2011 and docked with three rockets, but a few weeks ago China admitted that it had lost control of the spacecraft, and it was on a collision course with Earth in 2017.

It’s hoped that this second space lab will have more luck, and extra modules will be added over the new few years with the goal of being a fully operational space station by 2022.

China is only the third country, after Russia and the US, to launch its own crewed missions. But it was excluded from the International Space Station due to concerns over its military ambitions – which is why it’s now aiming to create its own that it hopes will operate for at least a decade.

The BBC reports that the launch was declared a success around 15 minutes after lift-off, and Chinese President Xi Jinping put out a congratulatory message in state-owned media saying he hoped the astronauts “vigorously advance the spirit of space travel”.

He added that this mission would “enable China to take larger and further steps in space exploration, and make new contributions to building up China as a space power”.

China has been heavily investing in space over the past few years, and had planned to launch at least 20 space missions in 2016.

It’s already landed a rover on the Moon (RIP Jade Rabbit), and now plans to launch another lunar probe to the far side of the Moon by 2018. By 2020, the country wants to send an unmanned rover to Mars, before it launches a crewed lunar mission in 2025.

Let’s just hope the Chinese Space program gets a little better at communicating with the rest of the international space community before then, with planetary scientist Monica Grady commenting over at The Conversation that it currently “operates almost completely independently of other space agencies”.

We wish Haipeng and Dong the best of luck on this latest crewed mission, and can’t wait to see what they do next. Onwards and upwards.

Join our fans by liking us on Facebook, or follow us on TwitterGoogle+feedlyflipboard and Instagram.

Check out our Flipboard magazine ESIST  If you enjoy reading our posts. All of our handpicked articles will be delivered to the flipboard magazine every day.

Original article on ScienceAlert

by FIONA MACDONALD